An excerpt:
“You see, what happened is that some of our philosophers got off base. And one of the great problems of history is that the concepts of love and power have usually been contrasted as opposites, polar opposites, so that love is identified with a resignation of power, and power with a denial of love. What is needed is a realization that power without love is reckless and abusive, and that love without power is sentimental and anemic.
Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice,
and justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love.
I’m concerned about a better world. I’m concerned about justice; I’m concerned about brotherhood; I’m concerned about truth. And when one is concerned about that, he can never advocate violence.
For through violence you may murder a murderer, but you can’t murder murder.
Through violence you may murder a liar, but you can’t establish truth.
Through violence you may murder a hater, but you can’t murder hate through violence.
Darkness cannot put out darkness; only light can do that.
And I say to you, I have also decided to stick with love, for I know that love is ultimately the only answer to mankind’s problems. And I’m going to talk about it everywhere I go. I know it isn’t popular to talk about it in some circles today. And I’m not talking about emotional bosh when I talk about love; I’m talking about a strong, demanding love. For I have seen too much hate… and I say to myself that hate is too great a burden to bear. I have decided to love. If you are seeking the highest good, I think you can find it through love.
I want to say to you as I move to my conclusion, as we talk about “Where do we go from here?” that we must honestly face the fact that the movement must address itself to the question of restructuring the whole of American society. There are forty million poor people here, and one day we must ask the question, “Why are there forty million poor people in America?”
We are called upon to help the discouraged beggars in life’s marketplace. But one day we must come to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. It means that questions must be raised. And you see, my friends, when you deal with this you begin to ask the question, “Who owns the oil?” You begin to ask the question, “Who owns the iron ore?” You begin to ask the question, “Why is it that people have to pay water bills in a world that’s two-thirds water?” These are words that must be said.
Now, don’t think you have me in a bind today. I’m not talking about communism. What I’m talking about is far beyond communism. Communism forgets that life is individual. Capitalism forgets that life is social.
And the kingdom of brotherhood is found neither in the thesis of communism nor the antithesis of capitalism, but in a higher synthesis. It is found in a higher synthesis that combines the truths of both.
And I must confess, my friends, that the road ahead will not always be smooth. There will still be rocky places of frustration and meandering points of bewilderment.
There will be inevitable setbacks here and there.
And there will be those moments when the buoyancy of hope will be transformed into the fatigue of despair.
Our dreams will sometimes be shattered and our ethereal hopes blasted.
But difficult and painful as it is, we must walk on in the days ahead with an audacious faith in the future.
Let us realize that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. This is our hope for the future, and with this faith we will be able to sing in some not too distant tomorrow, with a cosmic past tense,
‘We have overcome! We have overcome! Deep in my heart, I did believe we would overcome.’”
-Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. “Where do we go from here“
Growing up, I was never really taught the importance of MLK day. I’m positive I’ve heard excerpts from the “I have a dream” speech hundreds of times, or at least those first four words. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream, his dream in its entirety (thus including the above excerpt from a not so well known speech), lives on today.
Even if it is difficult, and painful.
I’ve been think about the notion of an “audacious faith in the future,” and at first was a little unsettled. Audacious has always been assimilated to “brazen” in my mind, and by no means did I consider brazen a positive protest word.
Brazen: face with defiance or impudence.
impudence: crust; the trait of being rude.
defiance: intentionally contemptuous behavior or attitude
contemptuous: expressing extreme contempt.
contempt: a manner that is generally disrespectful.
It’s not that I didn’t know what these words meant. I had an idea, anyway. Note to anyone taking the GRE’s: one of the biggest stumbling blocks in the vocab. portion is the assumption of what words mean, when you don’t know an exact definition. Often, they don’t mean quite what you think.
So brazen, as you followed through my chain of dictionary flipping, doesn’t equate to something desirable. When using audacious in a sentence, the first example that came to my mind was “I can’t believe he had the audacity to say that to your face!”
Yet, returning to the GRE advice, I found myself looking up audacious too. While brazen was one of the definitions given, the first I found read “invulnerable to fear or intimidation.”
Invulnerable. To say that fear is not even an option? That’s what I’m not sure how to respond to.
I have fear. But at the same time I can reflect that there’s a difference between having fear, and living in fear.
I am afraid of the media. Not in the sense that reporters will scale the walls outside my balcony, and choke me in the night with words that I don’t want to swallow… but in knowing that I’ve already unconsciously injested some of the myopic views that have become “proper” or “patriotic.” And the fear of knowing that while I’ve been trained to catch myself in this, both through my academic major(s) and US-2 training, such training isn’t available to the masses.
Have the days of “you can’t believe everything you read,” passed?
I am afraid of the misunderstandings of religion that are intentionally created. Roomkate and I got a letter in the mail from “Saint Matthew’s Churches Bishops,” that said “Let this be the best year of your life through faith and prayer. God is ready to help you reach your dreams and goals. God’s holy blessing power is in the enclosed anointed prayer rug of faith we are loaning you to use… We want this Prayer Rug to be touching both of your knees as you pray for the needs you are facing right now- if you need more joy, peace, health, money, a new car, a new house, healing, or whatever, we are a very old (57 years) church and want to know about it.” Enclosed with the letter was a page that is supposed to be mailed back, that says “Pray for my family and me for…” and then includes many options, such as: my soul, a home to call my own, a new car, a money blessing, pray for God to bless me with this amount of money (and then it has a line where you write in the blessing you’d like to receive.”
Can I take a moment to say WHAT THE HELL? I’m afraid of this shit.
Naturally, Roomkate and I could laugh at the piece of 11×17 paper “prayer rug” folded up, but only because we know better. Yet when the masses receive letters like this, what does that say to someone who doesn’t have an understanding of organized religion? Or spirituality in general? I am afraid people will think that this is how religion works.
Donald Miller, in this book “Blue Like Jazz,” writes “To me, God was more of an idea. It was something like a slot machine, a set of spinning images that dolled out rewards based on behavior, and, perhaps, chance… What I was doing was more in line with superstition than spirirtuality. But it worked. If something nice happened to me, I thought it was God, and if something nice didn’t, I went back to the slot machine, knelt down in prayer, and pulled the lever a few more times. I liked this God very much because you hardly had to talk to it and it never talked back. But the fun never lasts.”
A superstitious slot machine. How appropriate in addressing the idea of writing an arbitrary amount of money on a piece of paper, and hoping to get lucky through a blessing. But when you’re one 7 short of the big jackpot, what does that do to someone’s mentality about the power of religion and spirituality?
In conjunction, I’m afraid of tele-evangelists. I’ve seen paralyzed elders in nursing homes send hundreds of dollars to evangelists who promise that they’ll be able to walk again. Or others with terminal illness that try to pay for miracles when they don’t have enough money to pay for their hospital bills. It breaks my heart.
Consistently I’ve been told to use the 3 point model in my writing and public speaking. “It makes for a stronger argument, and better thesis,” my journalism professors critiqued frequently. But as I sip on my diet coke, I struggle to think of a third fear. That probably isn’t good for this blog so far, but it’s got to be some kind of good for my life.
I don’t live in fear.
But to put my education to use, I will end this in the recommended 3 point style:
While there’s a very good chance I mentioned this quote in a prior post, I don’t care because I enjoy it and I’m using it again- “There is not enough darkness in all the world to put out the light of even one small candle.” With this in mind, I believe that a candle is never dimmed by lighting another candle.
I believe as long as days like today are proactively remembered (in that there is curosity as to why we celebrate the birth of an individual, and research/reevaluate as to where we are as a population), we still have the audacious faith King wholeheartedly believed in.
Lastly, while I don’t argue with King that one day we can all sing “We have overcome!” (from whatever it might be that has been holding us back), I’d like to add-
I believe good things are already happening, all around me.