Jump feet first, first time.
In 1988, Johnson and Johnson released a VHS tape called “The Official Kids Safety Quiz.” Twenty years later, I find myself still recalling and reciting the practical advice of the robot alien “U-2-B,” who moderated the game show of automobile/pedestrian safety, swimming/water safety, fire safety and emergency response.
Game show questions like “True or false: if you can see the driver of a car, the driver of a car can see you,”
::or::
“You’re staying at your grandmother’s house when you see your little cousin Johnny playing with a box of matches. Should you tell someone?”
Jumping feet first, first time, was the catchy advice given in regards to swimming safety and testing the shallowness of unknown waters.
If Lao-tzu’s observance of a journey of a thousand miles beginning with a single step holds true, is it safe to assume that the more intensive journey of a lifetime requires you to dive in?
Diving in would immerse your head first, heart second, and feet last. If thoughts (combined with the feelings of heart) analyzed a situation before the feet gained a solid grounding, would the result be that the footing would remain indefinitely uncertain?
And if so, would this really be so tragic?
Even the firmness of soil is tested in times of flooding. To walk permanently on a ground comparable to the ocean’s beaches gives imagery of a world in compromise with life. Flexible, yet supportive. Changing, but conforming. The memories of digging my toes into the sand and finding relief from the overheated surface are comforting. Rock may provide sure footing, but you can’t mash your feet through it to cool off.
I’m getting ahead of myself. Where does this place the feet first, first time, advice?
I think it would be presumptuous to say that this approach is reserved for the timid. The reasoning for the safety slogan is obvious—so you don’t crack your head open in shallow waters. It implies the submersion of feet, heart, then head.
Sure footing implies a clear vision of life; an introspective response to an external stimuli. If one is grounded in their ways, how much flexibility does life have?
Could it be called timidness? Perhaps. But it could equally be called a strong will or audacity. You can’t stand for something if you don’t understand what’s under your feet.
The debate now becomes: is it better to start with articulate thoughts on shaky ground, or steady feet without contemplation? If muddied soil can harden, can shallow waters rise? With sure footing, is it still possible to be in over your head?
I propose that neither approach will be successful.
I wanted to write this Ash Wednesday night, after I came home from the service held at University Park. It always seems that when I’m in need of guidance, the messages come with perfect timing.
The reading for the evening was from Exodus 16:1-4. Oh Israelites, talk about receiving a freedom that you haven’t exactly bargained for. Instead of immediate deliverance, there was hunger and wandering. The wandering turned into murmuring. "If only we had died by the LORD's hand in Egypt!” Essentially—they’d rather be enslaved, dying in Egypt, then trying something unknown.
I wonder how much I murmur. Or cry out to be enslaved. Not because I like the pain associated with it, but because it's familiar.
Lent calls us into a journey through the unknown. While advent prepares us for the incarnation, we’re now being prepared for new life through the resurrection. The journey though? That’s where it gets personal.
Before this particular Ash Wednesday service began, we were all handed a small piece of paper. After Rev. Kottke finished his message about strength through the season, he asked us all to pull out the papers and meditate on what journey we would like to take these upcoming 40 days.
Perhaps it’s letting go of anger, Kottke said. Or overcoming grief. Or maybe your journey is shared with your family to rebuild relationships. Whatever it may be, it’s yours. Write it down.
I closed my eyes and swirled my thumb clockwise over the silky paper. This went on for about a minute before I opened my eyes and picked up the pencil.
BRoKENNESs. I wrote each letter slowly and boldly, pressing the pencil firmly into the paper. On the last “s”, the point splintered, and pieces of graphite smudged against my hand as I tried to brush them off the paper. This of course only seemed appropriate.
As I examined my paper, I licked my finger and rubbed it against my smeary palm in an attempt to cleanse the graphite. The word looked too alone. So I opened my purse as quietly as possible (which is never quite quiet enough when you’re in church), and dug for a pen to replace the broken pencil point.
Next to brokenness, and below the smudges, I wrote VULNERABiLiTY.
Because these journeys were to be our own, I figured we wouldn’t be sharing them out loud. But as I looked around the small congregation, I wondered if they would be collected and randomly distributed such that we could pray for a stranger. My words were clear, but they wouldn’t have made much sense to anyone else.
I picked up the pen again, and at the bottom of the paper I wrote “Give me” and drew a small arrow to my original word.
Give me -> BRoKENNESs.
Then looking at vulnerability, above it I wrote “(Let me become…).”
The grammar no longer made sense. So I made big X’s over the “iLiTY.” Below the scratched out markings I wrote in the letters “le.”
If the time allowed for meditation was any longer, I’m sure my paper would have become completely incoherent. Amidst the arrows, smudges, and blackened out parts, even I hardly understood the words on the paper. Rev. Kottke called our attention back to the front.
To stay true to the traditional wearing of ashes, Rev. Kottke explained that our markings would come from our journeys. That we would come to the front, put a corner of the paper into a candle flame, and drop the burning sheet into the bowl.
Amos Lee lyrics played through my head as one by one the people before me set their journeys ablaze, dropped them, and returned to their seats. I wonder what these people’s lives, what they might be all about. I didn’t want to wager a guess at what the other pieces of paper said. It would have been impossible to try.
We all carry secret things on our heart. Some hearts, unfortunately, have heavier weights than others.
But as I watched my words be consumed by fire, it occurred to me that it didn’t matter what their words were. Because their words were now my words. In the ashes, all of the words looked the same.
We were called to the front again, if we chose, to be anointed with these ashes as a sign of our journey. Rev. Kottke made the dust into a symbol on my forehead, saying “The Sign of the Cross: From ashes to ashes, remember your God, and remember your journey.”
Our journeys, combined into one source of ashes, made it the most powerful Ash Wednesday service I have ever been to.
I looked in the mirror when I got home. The ashes looked especially dark on my winter pale skin. Remembering my journey seemed paradoxal to the idea of it being forgetting everything I’ve learned.
I’m young, but I’ve been conditioned to believe that relationships mean being taken advantage of. And they mean being hurt.
So I had shut it all out.
I stopped feeling, stopped wanting to be attached. I professed openly that I didn’t believe in romantical love, or the institution of marriage, and that I was quite content being single for the rest of my life. I kept my heart hard, and my thoughts harder.
The fire from the ashes was out, so that wasn’t what was burning my soul as I looked into the mirror. It was the words of my journey that were igniting me.
And then, I cried. It was a good start to my path of feeling brokenness and vulnerability. At first I wasn’t really sure why I was crying, but then I realized I needed to purge my body of everything that had been hurting me. I needed to physically get it out, all of it out. All of the weight, the scars, the pain. The hurt.
And when I stopped crying, I was ready.
If the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step, I’m still not convinced the journey of a lifetime begins by diving in. Or jumping feet first, first time. I’ve decided that we should be belly flopping.
The shared problem between the first two approaches I examined earlier is that both put the heart in the middle. I don’t want my heart to be guarded by my groundings or by my thoughts, but for it to guide the two.
Guide my feet,
light my path,
hold my hand,
while I run this race
for I don’t want to run this race in vain…
On one of our first dates I said to him I just want to let you know that when things start going good, I tend to pull away. Its silly, but it’s what I do. I get scared.
He held my hand a little tighter and said I won’t let you. I’ll pull you back.
The way I look at it, if we belly flop, we can’t pull away. If our feet, heads, and hearts are on the same level, none will have the dominance to make decisions for the others. Not just in love, but in life.
Even if he would pull me back, I’m finding (for the first time) I don’t want to pull away.
I’m learning. It’s only been a week since Lent has started, but I’m learning.
Tony has said on a few occasions, always with a smile, “Learning is fun, isn’t it?”
And with him, it is.